I am beyond honored to teach an undergraduate course this semester titled, Law and the Bible, in Lipscomb’s Fred D. Gray Institute for Law, Justice, and Society—even more honored that it is based on a course built (and using a text edited) by friend and former colleague, Professor Bob Cochran. To have the opportunity to combine my legal training and ministry experience in a classroom is pretty great, and that there are eleven brilliant and passionate students enrolled is almost too good to be true.
Professor Cochran divided the Bible in nine sections and teamed legal scholars and theologians to write each chapter (he joined his friend, Dallas Willard, to approach the Gospels) and explore what the Bible teaches about law and its relevance to current issues.
We have much to discuss.
I have a complicated relationship with politics and rarely write publicly on political issues anymore, not because I no longer have opinions, but for other reasons. To sit in a classroom, however, and consider contemporary issues starting with the Bible, that has me excited.
I confess disappointment that religious folks often react to major political moments by supporting their predetermined political candidate/party without wrestling with the individual issue at hand based on theological arguments. One would think that those who claim religion would avoid automatically supporting one political party and examine each individual situation in light of their sacred text. Maybe the penetrating question is: What is truly sacred?
I’m excited to consider such questions this semester with a gifted group of college students.
Posted in Original Essays
Tagged 9-11, bible, christianity, cochran, college, dallas willard, fred gray, iran, just war theory, law, lipscomb, politics, sacred, theology, war
“Let the site tell you its secrets.” — Christopher Alexander
I joke that my propensity to arrive early for absolutely everything is a sickness, but in reality it is a treasured quality since it reminds me of mom and dad. Being early is my heritage. With age, it seems that I am less impressed with my unique qualities and particularly value those characteristics that connect me to a larger story.
I arrive very early for work on Sunday mornings to prepare for our church’s collective time together, a couple of hours early in fact—and love it. We decided to meet in stunning Stauffer Chapel this summer thanks to a brilliant suggestion from my friend, Sara, and the setting has made the early morning solitude particularly delightful.
I like the strange sensation of opening the door to discover that no one else is there and being the first to step inside. I like turning on the lights and straightening the hymnals and removing the leftover trash from the pew racks. I like arranging the podium and communion table just right and reviewing the sermon, imagining the congregation at breakfast preparing to join with me and with others. I like propping open the doors and hearing the gurgling fountain outside and then returning to the deafening quiet inside and the intense feeling of anticipation. I like to notice the sun pierce through the massive stained glass spraying psychedelic graffiti all over the quiet sanctuary.
Famed architect, Christopher Alexander, argued that users of a space know more about their needs than the architect and wrote, “Let the site tell you its secrets.” In my sacred Sunday solitude, I don’t seem to be able to articulate my needs, but it sure seems that the space has secrets to tell. I listen each week and can almost hear them. Maybe if I listen long enough?
In reality, I’m not sure that sacred spaces have actual secrets to tell. But maybe the wonder that is found in showing up early to listen is secret enough.
Posted in Original Essays
Tagged architect, christopher alexander, church, early, listen, pepperdine, quiet, sacred, secrets, silence, solitude, space, stauffer chapel